UK disability discrimination law and stammering / stuttering
Allan Tyrer M v Jacksons Dairy: perceived discrimination In M v Jacksons Dairy, the claimant mentioned his stammer in his CV when applying for a job. He was rejected without an interview. He did not claim that he had a disability within the EqA, but that he was rejected because the employer perceived he had a disability. … Read more
The claimant mentioned his stammer in his CV when applying for a job. He was rejected without an interview. He did not claim that he had a disability within the Equality Act 2010 (EqA), but claimed that he was rejected because the employer perceived he had a disability. The employment tribunal rejected his claim for … Read more
GCSEs and A-levels Update of GCSEs, A-levels and stammering/stuttering. It includes a specific example of extra time for stammering in 2025/26 JCQ guidance. Maritime and Coastguard Agency v Groom: paid “volunteers” In Maritime and Coastguard Agency v Groom, the Court of Appeal held that Coastal Rescue Officers (CROs) had legal rights as “workers”, despite being … Read more
S.121 Equality Act 2010 (EqA) requires serving members of the armed forces to bring a service complaint before starting an EqA tribunal claim. The Court of Appeal rejected an argument that for a matter in respect of which no service complaint was permitted, s.121 should be re-interpreted to allow a tribunal claim even without a … Read more
The Court of Appeal held that Coastal Rescue Officers (CROs) had legal rights as “workers”, despite being called volunteers. For many of their activities they had the right to claim remuneration (not just expenses), if they chose to do so. The court held that legally, on each call-out there was a contract under which they … Read more
The Equality Act 2010 (EqA) employment provisions exclude disability discrimination claims by members of the armed forces. On the wording of the EqA, such claims by former members are also excluded. Overruling a previous tribunal decision, the EAT held that the EqA cannot be re-interpreted under human rights law to allow a former member of … Read more
Research on eyewitness testimony of people who stammer Recent study by the University of Bath, including credibility of witnesses who stammer compared with those who do not, with mock jurors. More: Research on eyewitness testimony of people who stammer, 2025. Unfair dismissal changes, and passing of Employment Rights Act 2025 The Employment Rights Act 2025 … Read more
The Court of Appeal discussed the test for whether a person ’caused’ discrimination by another, so as to be liable under s.111(2) Equality Act 2010 (EqA). The court said that once ‘but for’ causation is established, the tribunal has to decide whether it is fair or just or reasonable to find the person liable, with … Read more
In this 1982 case, an employer asked the head of careers at a school for suitable applicants for a job. The employer said it would rather she did not send anyone coloured. The EAT held this was unlawful as attempting to “induce” discrimination, contrary to the Race Relations Act 1976. To “induce” meant “to persuade … Read more
The University of Bath has conducted a study: K.Maras et al, “Eyewitness testimony by individuals who stammer: Evidence, experience and perceived credibility”, https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.70014 Very briefly, some points from the study: It should be noted that this study was not of witnesses speaking in a courtroom setting, or in a group setting. Each witness was interviewed … Read more