This sitemap shows a list of all the pages on the website, first the structured pages and then news and cases.
Structured pages
- Stammeringlaw
- Disability equality law
- Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales
- Northern Ireland disability discrimination law
- Types of discrimination are more limited in Northern Ireland
- Employment: disability discrimination in Northern Ireland
- Services (including transport): disability discrimination in Northern Ireland
- Education: disability discrimination in Northern Ireland
- Public authorities: disability discrimination in Northern Ireland
- Definition of disability: Northern Ireland
- Brexit: disability discrimination in Northern Ireland
- Northern Ireland disability discrimination law
- Equality law and stammering: one-page outline
- Is the stammer a disability?
- Disability: “Substantial” effect
- Disability: ‘Normal day-to-day activities’
- Cases on whether stammer is a ‘disability’
- Reluctance to be seen as “disabled”
- 2011 Guidance on definition of disability
- Disability: Hiding the stammer
- ‘Disability’: longer-term variations
- Disability: “Physical or mental impairment”
- Disability: Discounting speech techniques etc
- Proving disability: impact statements and expert reports
- Perceived disability
- Disability: Stammering starting in adulthood
- Types of discrimination
- ‘Direct discrimination’ vs ‘discrimination arising from disability’
- Discrimination arising from disability (s.15 Equality Act)
- Direct discrimination
- Harassment
- Indirect discrimination
- Duty to make reasonable adjustments (s.20 EqA)
- Victimisation
- Who is liable under the Equality Act
- Discrimination by association
- Proving discrimination
- Knowledge of disability
- Multiple discrimination (dual discrimination)
- Guidance and Codes of Practice: Equality Act 2010
- Proposed changes
- Brexit, human rights and UN
- Public Sector Equality Duty (PSED)
- Cases on stammering
- Disability discrimination links
- Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales
- Employment
- Employment FAQs
- Reasonable adjustments: employment
- Recruitment and promotion
- In the job
- Losing one’s job
- Examples of jobs done by people who stammer/ stutter
- Different types of worker
- Resolving employment disputes
- Links on employment, stammering and equality law
- Information for businesses on stammering (stuttering) and Equality Act 2010
- Services
- Services to the public FAQs
- Public functions
- Examples of adjustments and discrimination: service providers
- Appearing in court with a stammer
- Reasonable adjustments by service providers: rules
- Transport
- Not having to rely on friends and family
- Complaints and going to court: services
- ‘Associations’
- Connection with Great Britain: services
- Services: Which rules apply?
- Education and people who stammer in Britain
- University and college, including exams
- Work placements related to education courses
- Schools and disability discrimination for pupils who stammer
- Sources of help and advice
- About
- News
- Telephone
News and cases
Starting with the most recent:
- Website updates November to December 2023
- Website updates September to October 2023
- Stammering Awareness Day 2023
- Grandmother visiting hospital laughed at by nurse
- STAMMA job application workshops
- F-Bomb blog: oracy in schools
- Booking a GP appointment: removing barriers for people who stammer
- Website updates July to August 2023
- Website updates May to June 2023
- Website updates March to April 2023
- M v Manchester Rusk Co
- A v Qualasept
- A v Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust
- Is “disclosing” a stammer the right word to use?
- Website updates January to February 2023
- McCue v Glasgow City Council
- R (Efthimiou) v The City of London
- Website updates November to December 2022
- Website updates September to October 2022
- Website updates July to August 2022
- Toplak and Mrak v Slovenia
- Lárusson v Iceland
- G v The Insolvency Service
- R (SC) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
- D v Nottingham Squash Rackets Club
- T v Ministry of Defence: disability discrimination claim by former member of armed forces
- Website updates May to June 2022
- Department of Work and Pensions v Boyers
- Abrahart v University of Bristol: oral assessments led to suicide
- Website updates March to April 2022
- W v TJ Morris (t/a Home Bargains)
- Primaz v Carl Room Restaurants t/a McDonald’s Restaurants
- Mallon v Aecom: auxiliary services, and help from others
- STAMMA in the cinema: “No diversity without dysfluency”
- Social model: new research paper
- Garcia v The Leadership Factor: “clear voice”
- M v Real Care Agency
- Website updates January to February 2022
- Example: Assessed presentation at university
- C v Menzies Aviation
- Website updates November to December 2021
- N v Packaging Automation: need for evidence of disability
- Stott v Ralli
- Website updates September to October 2021
- Follows v Nationwide Building Society
- Little Mix concert: case on BSL interpreters
- R (Rowley) v Minister for the Cabinet Office: BSL interpreters
- R (VC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Website updates July to August 2021
- Guide for universities on stammering
- Participants needed for study about experience of witnesses who stammer in court
- Apple stammering emoji
- Website updates May to June 2021
- M v Ban-Car Hotel
- Elliot v Dorset County Council
- Website updates March to April 2021
- O v TC Facilities Management
- VL v Szpital Klinicnzy
- Uber v Aslam: self-employed workers
- Website updates January to February 2021
- Nwabueze v University of Law
- G. L. v Italy
- Website updates November to December 2020
- Y v West Yorkshire Combined Authority
- R (Adiatu & IWGB) v HM Treasury
- Heskett v Secretary of State for Justice
- Stammering case with impact statement, 2020
- Website updates September to October 2020
- “Find the right words” campaign by Stamma
- Website updates July to August 2020
- Robinson v Department for Work and Pensions
- Coronavirus (Covid-19)
- G v British Airways
- Website updates May to June 2020
- C v Spencer & Arlington
- Website updates March to April 2020
- JD and A v United Kingdom
- Ishola v Transport for London
- Website updates January to February 2020
- Website updates November to December 2019
- Bessong v Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust
- Igweike v TSB Bank
- Website updates September to October 2019
- Laughed at in coffee shop (Sept 2019)
- Stammering Pride and Prejudice: book
- 20th anniversary of stammeringlaw
- Website updates July to August 2019
- British Telecommunications v Meier
- 50 Million Voices: stuttering and work
- Anderson v Turning Point Eespro
- Stamma poster campaign
- Owen v Amec Foster Wheeler Energy
- Perceived disability: Chief Constable of Norfolk v Coffey
- Website updates May to June 2019
- This site is now on WordPress!
- Website updates to April 2019
- Trustees of Swansea University Pension & Assurance Scheme v Williams
- City of Oxford Bus Services Ltd t/a Oxford Bus Company v Harvey
- Dunn v Secretary of State for Justice
- C & C v The Governing Body of a School
- Natwest advert withdrawn
- Unite the Union v Nailard
- Lee v Ashers Baking (‘gay cake’ case)
- City of York Council v Grosset
- Enver Şahin v Turkey
- O’Sullivan v London Borough of Islington
- M v Mitie Aviation Security
- Petrol station (July 2017)
- Blamires v Local Government Ombudsman
- Government Legal Service v Brookes
- Bus driver laughs at passenger’s stammer (March 2017)
- Home Office v Kuranchie
- Coffee shop mocks stammer on customer’s cup (January 2017)
- Paulley v FirstGroup plc
- Guberina v Croatia
- Galo v Bombadier Aerospace
- Rackham v NHS Professionals
- Banaszczyk v Booker
- Çam v Turkey
- Griffiths v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
- Small v Taylor Edwards
- CHEZ v Komisia za zashtita ot diskriminatsia
- Thompson v London Central Bus
- CLFIS (UK) Ltd v Reynolds
- IB v Greece
- PP v Trustees of Leicester Grammar School
- Blackwood v Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust
- Finnigan v Northumbria Police
- MM & DM v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
- B v Ceredigion County Council
- LH Bishop v Commissioners of Revenue and Customs
- Edwards v Flamingo Land
- Chacón Navas v Eurest Colectividades SA
- Royal Bank of Scotland v Allen
- Sobhi v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis
- Mental Health Care v Biluan
- Ring v Dansk almennyttigt Boligselskab
- Jamieson v Chorlton High School
- B v Servisair (UK) Ltd
- Cruickshank v VAW Motorcast
- ZH v The Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis
- Paterson v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis
- Aderemi v London and South Eastern Railway
- Roads v Central Trains
- Lowe v Cabinet Office
- X v Mid Sussex Citizens Advice Bureau
- M v Asda
- London Borough of Lewisham v Malcolm
- Burnip v Birmingham City Council
- Ross v Ryanair
- R v Isleworth Crown Court ex parte Murray King
- In the matter of Horan
- Example: Turned down for accountancy job
- Example: Restaurant puts phone down
- Example: Queue in bank
- Being mistaken for drunk
- Burke v College of Law and SRA
- Glor v Switzerland
- G.N. v Italy
- Alajos Kiss v Hungary
- Kiyutin v Russia
- Aitken v Commissioner of Police of The Metropolis
- Aylott v Stockton on Tees Borough Council
- Cordell v Foreign and Commonwealth Office
- Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis v Ekpe
- Anwar v Tower Hamlets College
- Roberts v North West Ambulance Service
- Extended probationary period
- B v John Edward Crowther Ltd
- Kücükdeveci v Swedex GmbH & Co KG
- J v DLA Piper UK LLP
- United States case: Hartman v National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME)
- Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police v Jelic
- SCA Packaging v Boyle
- S v Translink
- W v Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
- Cheltenham Borough Council v Laird
- Amnesty International v Ahmed
- Fareham College v Walters
- Chief Constable of Dumfries & Galloway v Adams
- R (N) v London Borough of Dagenham and Barking Independent Appeal Panel
- Richmond Adult Community College v McDougall
- Matuszowicz v Kingston Upon Hull City Council
- HM Land Registry v Wakefield, EAT decision
- Wakefield v HM Land Registry, Employment Tribunal decision
- Ohio firefighter case – Columbus v Liebhart
- Hansard on direct discrimination
- R v. Immigration Officer at Prague Airport ex parte European Roma Rights Centre
- Sex discrimination cases on stereotyping
- Coleman v Attridge Law
- Pretending not to understand, laughing and hanging up phone (October 2008)
- Case study: open plan office and anxiety
- Coleman v Attridge Law: Advocate General’s Opinion
- Child Support Agency (Dudley) v Truman
- Cunningham v Ballylaw Foods Ltd
- Projector case study
- Project Management Institute v Latif
- Helpline laughing at stammer
- Time off work for stammering course
- High Quality Lifestyles v Watts
- S v The Lord Advocate
- Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis v Virdi
- Vance v Royal Mail Group
- Coombe v Bessell
- Chacón Navas v Eurest Colectividades SA: Advocate General’s opinion
- Taylor v OCS Group Ltd
- Reasonable adjustment settlement
- Tudor v Spen Corner Veterinary Centre
- Heatherwood & Wrexham Park Hospitals Trust v Beer
- S v Tesco
- British Telecommunications plc v Abadeh
- Woodrup v London Borough of Southwark
- Y v Bradford Council: claimant’s comments
- Y v Bradford Council
- Carden v Pickerings Europe Ltd
- RCSLT award
- Millar v Inland Revenue
- T v Office for National Statistics
- Correct comparison for reasonable adjustment duty: case
- Archibald v Fife Council
- Igen v Wong
- Jones v Post Office
- X v Y
- R v Powys County Council, ex parte Hambidge (No. 2)
- Y v Calderdale Council
- B v Apcoa Parking
- “Victory for deaf man in landmark judgment”
- W v British School of Motoring
- McNicol v Balfour Beatty Rail Maintenance
- Disability Conciliation Service case on speech impairment
- A v Walkers Snack Foods Ltd
- De Keyser Ltd v Wilson
- Phelps v Hillingdon Council
- A v London Borough of Hounslow
- Newham Citizens Advice Bureau v Murray
- AE Proctor Ltd v Hutton
- James v Eastleigh Borough Council
- Vicary v British Telecommunications plc
- Greenwood v British Airways
- Buxton v Equinox Design
- Ridout v TC Group
- Kenrick v HJ Heinz Co Ltd
- Kapadia v London Borough of Lambeth
- Morse v Wiltshire County Council
- Goodwin v Patent Office
- Clark v Novacold
