
| Home | Overview | Disability | Discrimination | Employment | Services | Education | PSED | Benefits | Business | Advice | Links | More... |
|
These pages do not apply outside the Great Britain.
|
|
An oral examination for a person training to be a Russian interpreter cannot be done in an alternative way, e.g. as a written examination, because the examination is to ascertain whether someone can speak Russian." On responsibility for actions of employees: |
Note: this page covers the Equality Act 2010 position from 1st October 2010. See also pre-Equality Act position and Which Act applies: Equality Act or DDA?
Exam boards assessing GCSEs, A-levels and the like are within the Equality Act. Disability discrimination rules cover both the standards being assessed, and the way in which they are assessed.
Where disabled candidates are put at a disadvantage by aspects of an examination, an important test is whether what the exam board's actions are a legitimate means of achieving a legitimate aim. This is the objective justification test - follow that link for more detail on it. The exam board's actions will often be unlawful if they do not satisfy this test. Exam boards are also very often subject to the duty to make reasonable adjustments.
Generally, the normal types of discrimination, including harassment and victimisation, are made unlawful. See below Duties on exam boards.
There is a consultation by Ofqual on setting certain limits to the reasonable adjustment duty in England. More on the Ofqual consultation - this links to a separate page on the reasonable adjustment duty in relation to exam boards.
The statutory rules for general exam boards are in EqA s.96 and s.97 (with Sch 13 para 9). They do not apply to trade and qualifications bodies and further and higher education institutions, which have separate rules.
| 'Access arrangements' is the term for arrangements agreed before an assessment to allow learners with special educational needs, disabilities or temporary injuries to access the assessment, They allow learners to show what they know and can do without changing the demands of the assessment. Access arrangements include Equality Act adjustments, but also extend to some learners who do not have a 'disability' within the Equality Act. |
At GCSE level, oral work is relevant in particular for GCSE English or English Language, and for GCSE Modern Languages where the student is taking them - or equivalent exams in Scotland. On stammering specifically, do look at the British Stammering Association (BSA) links below under Main links - stammering, which consider those exams. For example, it may well be helpful if, even under normal practice, an oral exam is done with the teacher with whom the pupil has built a relationship (indeed in many cases it is assessed by that teacher). It seems that for GCSE English and Modern languages often access arrangements approved by the examining board will not be required, though they may sometimes be needed for certain GCSE Modern Language syllabuses: the particular syllabus used by the school needs to be checked. More generally, long-term preparation for a student can be very helpful. The BSA resources linked below deal with these points and much more.
As well as exam boards, schools will therefore often have a very important role to play in how they support students consistently with the criteria set by exam boards, and of course - if access arrangements are required in the particular case - approaching the exam board on these. Schools themselves have obligations under the Equality Act, which are likely to apply here.
For the practice of exam boards on access arrangements generally, see JCQ's Access Arrangements, Reasonable Adjustments and Special Consideration: General and Vocational Qualifications linked below under at Main links - general.
What adjustments can be made is constrained by the skills (competence standards) being tested - e.g. ability to speak a language cannot be tested in writing. Understandably, focus tends to be on adjusting the way in which a given standard is assessed. Do bear in mind though that the competence standards themselves, ie. what is assessed, are also subject to the Equality Act. E.g. if 'fluency' is a skill being assessed, it may simply not be lawful to assess that. And if for example oral persuasiveness were being assessed, there would be questions of whether it is proportionate (under the 'objective justification' test) and reasonable to insist that the assessment must be of 'oral' skills - that speech (or speech only) be used. For the Equality Act duties, see below Duties on exam boards.
Seeking exemption from a speaking component because of a stammer is not normally likely to be advisable: see GCSE oral components (link to BSA website), 2009. The focus should generally be on appropriate arrangements to enable the student to take the component. BSA suggests it should be contacted for advice if the school of a child who stammers suggests they be exempted.
The rules considered on this page apply to examination/awarding bodies which provide general qualifications such as GCSEs, A and AS levels, and other non-vocational exams - including Scottish and Welsh equivalents. The legislation calls these bodies 'general qualifications bodies' (I will call them 'exam boards'). Examples are AQA, Edexel and OCR.
Regulations set out details of the qualifications covered:
These rules do not apply to National Curriculum Assessments. See on those National curriculum assessments: Access arrangements (link to qcda.gov.uk).
In the absence of specifications (see below Wider reasonable adjustment duty), the full range of discrimination claims applies to exam boards, including the full reasonable adjustment duty. This extends both to the application of competence standards and to the way they are assessed: on stammering, see above Stammering specifically: Competence standards are also subject to the Equality Act.
Types of discrimination claim therefore include:
The rules applying to exam boards are wider than those for other qualifications, in that with exam boards the reasonable adjustment duty (as well as the other Equality Act provisions) can apply to the question of what competence standards are being assessed, as well as to the process of assessing them. That is subject to any 'specifications' by regulators, which can limit the reasonable adjustment duty - but none have yet been made (so far as I know, as at early June 2011), and when made they may in any event not alter this principle. For more, see separate page Examining boards: Reasonable adjustment duty.
You can read more about the difference between what is being assessed (competence standards) and the process of assessing it at What are the Equality Act rules on oral assessments? - though bear in mind that page deals with higher education where, unlike exam boads, the reasonable adjustment duty does not apply to the competence standards themselves. To put this in context, remember that even where the reasonable adjustment duty does not apply to what competence standards are assessed (as is the case with higher education for example, or if specifications to that effect are made for exam boards), the other provisions of the Equality Act still apply to this. On exam boards and stammering, see above Stammering specifically: Competence standards are also subject to the Equality Act.
A Code of Practice covering exam boards for the Equality Act 2010 is not yet available. However, the relevant pre-Equality Act Code of Practice remains in force even for discrimination after October 2010 (see 'Are the Codes of Practice issued by the DRC, CRE and EOC now obsolete?' (link to EHRC website)). The relevant Code of Practice - albeit based on rules which have now changed - is the Revised Code of Practice: Trade Organisations, Qualifications Bodies and General Qualifications Bodies (link to pdf on EHRC website).
Nearly always, any issues will be sorted out with or through the school. See above Stammering specifically, and the BSA resources below under Main links - stammering.
If the argument is that the exam board (rather than the school) has breached the Equality Act, and this cannot be resolved, any court case would go to the county court (sheriffs court in Scotland). This is unlike trade/professional qualification bodies where disputes go to the more user-friendly Employment Tribunal.
A possible alternative is to approach the EHRC helpline and ask to be referred to the Equalities Mediation Service: www.equalities-mediation.org.uk. For this service to be used, there must be a referral from the EHRC and the exam board must agree.
See also Understanding access arrangements and special consideration (link to Ofqual website), including the heading 'If my application is refused, what can I do?'
Homepage | Equality Act in outline | Meaning of "disability" | Employment | Goods and services | Education | Human Rights Act | Proposed changes | Social security | Advice | Links | What's new | Site index | Privacy (cookies) | Disclaimer
© Allan Tyrer 1999-2011
Last updated 2nd September, 2011
Schools
University etc
Exam boards
DDA in schools
SEN
DDA post-16 - overview
Oral assessments
DDA post-16 - more detail